Re: DFSG-ness of two

[Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>]

Le Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:26:59AM +1000, Riley Baird a écrit :
> > > - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source
> > > -    (or altered version of it) to other developers. When You
> > > -    use this product in a comercial package, the source may
> > > -    not be charged seperatly.
> > 
> > This clause is really annoying, but it seems to allow the file to be
> > sold as part of a commercial package. Hence, it could perhaps be
> > considered to meet DFSG#1.
> 
> But a developer doesn't have the freedom to sell the software for
> profit to other developers.

Hi Riley,

as suggested in the original question, this clause is similar to clause 1 of
the SIL Open Font License 1.1, which is DFSG-Free.

  > Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in Original
  > or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself.

Have a nice week-end,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan