On 11/08/14 07:26, Francesco Ariis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:50:03AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote: >> [...] but since releasing it under GPL-3+ would make it non-free, >> you should use only the MIT license. > > Are GPL-3/GPL-3+ non DFSG free? Since when? > They are normally DFSG free, but when linked with OpenSSL without an exception, they aren't.