[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A clarification with dual licensing

On 11/08/14 07:26, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:50:03AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
>> [...] but since releasing it under GPL-3+ would make it non-free,
>> you should use only the MIT license.
> Are GPL-3/GPL-3+ non DFSG free? Since when?
They are normally DFSG free, but when linked with OpenSSL without an
exception, they aren't.

Reply to: