Hi, I was advised to contact debian legal on this matter. A libstrophe software [1] claims to have dual license, as read from LICENSE.txt [2]: --- libstrophe XMPP client library Copyright (C) 2005-2009 Collecta, Inc. This program is dual licensed under the MIT and GPLv3 licenses. Please the files MIT-LICENSE.txt and GPL-LICENSE.txt for details. --- The package also links to openssl, so from obvious reasons MIT would be better for us. The question is, in this case, can I "choose" a license to be MIT or the "and" word glues these two licenses together ? [1] https://github.com/strophe/libstrophe [2] https://github.com/strophe/libstrophe/blob/master/LICENSE.txt PS: Please CC me in your responses, I am not a subscriber of debian-legal list. -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature