[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A clarification with dual licensing

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:50:03AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
> [...] but since releasing it under GPL-3+ would make it non-free,
> you should use only the MIT license.

Are GPL-3/GPL-3+ non DFSG free? Since when?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: