Re: Re: Question about GPL and DFSG Compatibility of a Proposed Amendment to the W3C Document Licence

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: Question about GPL and DFSG Compatibility of a Proposed Amendment to the W3C Document Licence
From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:16:08 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1304064968.32026.72.camel@pi0307572>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4DB98AB4.2080307@lachy.id.au>
References: <[🔎] BANLkTimrbPjczEQehw74hemCD+TKvbTqGQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 4DB98AB4.2080307@lachy.id.au>

Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 à 17:41 +0200, Lachlan Hunt a écrit : 
> However, since GPL compatibility is a requirement for the licence, I'm 
> hoping the W3C can be convinced to give up on these alternatives if it 
> can be proven that they are not compatible.

If GPL compatibility is a requirement, they should add an option 4: the
GPL.

End of trouble.

-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
  `-

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Question about GPL and DFSG Compatibility of a Proposed Amendment to the W3C Document Licence
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: Re: Question about GPL and DFSG Compatibility of a Proposed Amendment to the W3C Document Licence
  - From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: NASA Open Source Agreement
Next by Date: Re: NASA Open Source Agreement
Previous by thread: Re: Question about GPL and DFSG Compatibility of a Proposed Amendment to the W3C Document Licence
Next by thread: Re: Question about GPL and DFSG Compatibility of a Proposed Amendment to the W3C Document Licence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread