Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?

To: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:41:11 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20101227154111.GW2813@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4D17E354.7080509@youngman.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20101225125809.GA1628@div0.qc.to> <[🔎] 20101226211359.GC2813@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <[🔎] 4D17E354.7080509@youngman.org.uk>

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 00:52:36 +0000, Wols Lists wrote:

> Any attempt to sue a European distributor would hopefully (a) get shut
> down damn fast, and (b) be a painful experience for the plaintiff.
> 
Sounds like wishful thinking to me.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
  - From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>

References:
- S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
  - From: Rudolf Polzer <divVerent@alientrap.org>
- Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
  - From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
  - From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
Next by Date: Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
Previous by thread: Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
Next by thread: Re: S3TC patent violation in multiple packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread