Re: CMU LTI Licence

[Walter Landry <wlandry@caltech.edu>]

Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> Or is the copyright holder's intent that the acknowledgement be clearly
> visible to every recipient, even those who receive a non-source form of
> the work? The latter would be a non-free restriction, like the obnoxious
> advertising clause in the older BSD licenses.

The obnoxious advertising clause is DFSG-free.  The license mentioned
in DFSG #10 was originally the BSD with advertising clause.

  http://web.archive.org/web/19990210065944/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license

Cheers,
Walter Landry
wlandry@caltech.edu