Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> writes: > When there is no source (== preferred form for making modifications) > available, I do not think we should call the work DFSG-free. I would clarify the ambiguity of “available”: The upstream developer, by definition, has available a preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. That is the source, and works for which that source is not made available *to recipients* of the work (with all the rest of the DFSG freedoms and requirements) should not be considered DFSG-free. -- \ “Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an | `\ affirmation, but as a question.” —Niels Bohr | _o__) | Ben Finney
Attachment:
pgpXMvWuRGHWs.pgp
Description: PGP signature