On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:29:42 +1100 Ben Finney wrote: > Francesco Poli writes: > > > When there is no source (== preferred form for making modifications) > > available, I do not think we should call the work DFSG-free. > > I would clarify the ambiguity of “available”: The upstream > developer, by definition, has available a preferred form of the work > for making modifications to it. > > That is the source, and works for which that source is not made > available *to recipients* of the work (with all the rest of the DFSG > freedoms and requirements) should not be considered DFSG-free. Yes, definitely. Thanks for making it clearer than I could do in my quickly-written message. -- New location for my website! Update your bookmarks! http://www.inventati.org/frx ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp_J5MZSlx1r.pgp
Description: PGP signature