Re: Non free license?
On 12/20/08, Pietro Battiston <toobaz@email.it> wrote:
> Hello debian-legal,
>
> I'm interested in packaging Shapely, a python library [0].
>
> The library was already packaged once, uploaded and then rejected by
> ftp-masters: I tried to get the reason but didn't get a response from
> (eventual) maintainer, neither from ftp-masters.
>
> In the end, I'm repackaging it from scratch, but also trying to guess
> what could be the reason of the rejection, and I noticed a not really
> standard license... but in fact, it's a normal 3-clauses BSD license,
> with the third clause slightly modified [1].
>
> Could you confirm this license is OK with debian?
Looks OK to me.
Regards
--
Andrew Donnellan <>< andrew[at]donnellan[dot]name
http://andrew.donnellan.name ajdlinux[at]gmail[dot]com
http://linux.org.au hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
---------------------------------------------------------------
"the govt should be paying the tax"
- A friend of mine, 02/11/2008
Reply to: