Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?
"Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <email@example.com> writes:
> 2008/9/10 Ben Finney <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <email@example.com> writes:
> >> And I argue that this extra cost is no greater than the cost of
> >> providing the network interface that's triggering this clause in
> >> the first place.
> I have been interpreting the AGPL […] that these additional costs
> can be transferred onto third parties for whom the cost is probably
That's a different argument to your earlier message.
You can't argue both "zero additional costs" *and* "non-zero
additional costs which are negligible for some parties in some
circumstances". Which is it?
\ “What if the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about?” —anonymous |