Re: Questions about liblouis
Miriam Ruiz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Am I the only one seeing problems in the wording of these
> "permissions"? What does "not bound by the GPL"? [...]
> Does it make sense? [...]
No, you're not the only one.
It might mean that we don't have a valid license for those acts, or it
might mean that some other (unspecified) license is offered.
Yes, it makes sense, but it doesn't mean what I hope the licensor meant.
The added restriction means that we don't have a useable permission
anyway and so liblouis isn't free software yet. What a waste.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct