Re: Logo trademark license vs. copyright license
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:02:11PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: [...]
> > Further, it's up to *Debian* to decide what uses of the logo reflect badly
> > on it and consequently should be disallowed because we don't wish to be
> > associated with them. Your above statement includes an implicit value
> > judgement about which sorts of activities Debian will or will not wish to be
> > associated with, which may not be at all representative of the views of the
> > project members at large.
> Two things wrong with that:
> Firstly, much of this thread seems to be taken up by people saying that the
> project can't disallow things which we don't think reflect badly on debian
> but other people generally do. Why is this different?
Huh? Do I understand right that you're asking me to justify others'
contributions to this thread?
> Secondly, if any debian developers think sweatshop-sewn shirts of cotton
> subsidised by one of the world's richest countries reflect well on the
> project,
The inverse of "reflects badly" is not "reflects well", it's "does not
reflect badly".
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: