Re: creative commons

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: creative commons
From: Jeff Carr <basilarchia@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:21:32 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 45AD6C0C.1050509@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070113034349.GI4612@mauritius.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 1168039037.3104.2.camel@portatil> <[🔎] 1007a32a0701051548i66a0b91co79c8b79fb94bfcc5@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070106014336.794b9e13.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] 45A321CA.4080004@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070109181657.75bd3fbc.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] 45A87159.6010001@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070113034349.GI4612@mauritius.dodds.net>

On 01/12/07 19:43, Steve Langasek wrote:

>> Mail-Followup-To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org

BTW, I noticed this line by looking at your emails since replies to
your emails work correctly.

> That's not how M-F-T is supposed to work.  M-F-T is for specifying an
> *alternative* to the list address when doing a list reply.

OK I don't know. I went to read up on this to learn what I could. If
I'm reading this correctly, this seems to say it is ok to be used for
either use:

http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html (D. J. Bernstein)

I'm not saying that D. J. Bernstein is right, but it's worth noting he
contributed to RFC 2822.

Reply to:

References:
- creative commons
  - From: Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: "Andrew Donnellan" <ajdlinux@gmail.com>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Jeff Carr <basilarchia@gmail.com>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Jeff Carr <basilarchia@gmail.com>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: creative commons
Next by Date: Re: creative commons
Previous by thread: Re: creative commons
Next by thread: Re: creative commons
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread