Re: creative commons

To: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: creative commons
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:26:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87lkk5fj77.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1168783711.3808.4.camel@tomoyo> (Josselin Mouette's message of "Sun\, 14 Jan 2007 15\:08\:31 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 1168039037.3104.2.camel@portatil> <[🔎] 1007a32a0701051548i66a0b91co79c8b79fb94bfcc5@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070106014336.794b9e13.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] 45A321CA.4080004@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070109181657.75bd3fbc.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] 45A87159.6010001@gmail.com> <[🔎] 1168783711.3808.4.camel@tomoyo>

Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:

> No, this is because *your* MUA is broken. The Mail-Followup-To header is
> not a standard of any kind, which is why only a handful of (broken) MUAs
> implement it. And I mean broken, because it should be named X-Something
> until it gets standardized.

It is unfair to say those MUAs are broken.  In the update of RFC 822
the stuff regarding X- were removed in RFC 2822.  Experience is that
it causes interop failures when moving an experimental X- header into
a non-experimental header.

/Simon

Reply to:

References:
- creative commons
  - From: Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: "Andrew Donnellan" <ajdlinux@gmail.com>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Jeff Carr <basilarchia@gmail.com>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Jeff Carr <basilarchia@gmail.com>
- Re: creative commons
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: creative commons
Next by Date: Re: creative commons
Previous by thread: Re: creative commons
Next by thread: Re: creative commons
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread