Re: Choosing a License: GNU APL? AFL 3.0?
On Dec 31, 2007 1:47 AM, MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I don't know whether the problems with the CDDL that 1. it does not
> follow the DFSG if there are active patents on the Covered Software;
> 2. Matthew Garrett's comment at
Yes, thanks for bringing these to my attention. I'm currently thinking
about the Eiffel Forum License version 2, which is a pretty concise
license. It fails the column C test, but the single clause that makes
* any distribution of this package, whether modified or not,
includes this license text.
Could easily be deleted. Is it DFSG compatible? Would it still be DFSG
compatible with this clause deleted?
> Why don't you file a bug that Google Mail doesn't support List-Post and
> other common mailing list behaviours? You're the user, after all.
Because I don't know that it's common, and I don't mind the behaviour
myself (I think that good clients should drop duplicates).
Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/