Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses
On 03/09/2007, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> Le dimanche 02 septembre 2007 à 13:46 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > No, GFDL'ed stuff got approved before a few people managed to change the
> > DFSG by disguising that as "editorial changes".
>
> Only you and Anthony Towns believe the changes were not editorial.
Just for the record, I also believe and believed that it was not an
editorial change.
(BTW, I voted for it because I think it makes no sense to try to draw
a line between programs and other kinds of data)
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
Reply to: