frx@firenze.linux.it wrote: >I disagree that this can be a good approximation, since assuming it is >would imply that DFSG-compliance bugs (almost) never happen. Indeed, they do not. >One example is all the GFDL-ed stuff that got approved before realizing >that it does not comply with the DFSG. No, GFDL'ed stuff got approved before a few people managed to change the DFSG by disguising that as "editorial changes". -- ciao, Marco