On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:40:46 -0700 Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > It is my opinion that the MPL license fails to meet the DFSG. > > This opinion seems to be shared by other debian-legal regulars: > > The MPL is an accepted license for main. I'm sorry your opinion > differs, and that the views of other non-DDs and non-maintainers on > the matter have gone uncorrected and left the misleading impression > that there's any question as to whether the MPL is suitable for main. ATATIAAWBI, bla, bla, ... -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpcDyBvNS1uD.pgp
Description: PGP signature