On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > It is my opinion that the MPL license fails to meet the DFSG. > This opinion seems to be shared by other debian-legal regulars: The MPL is an accepted license for main. I'm sorry your opinion differs, and that the views of other non-DDs and non-maintainers on the matter have gone uncorrected and left the misleading impression that there's any question as to whether the MPL is suitable for main. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature