On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:52:34 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote: [...] > This is why I propose that alternate wording - which surely deserves > improvement - which makes clearer that this doesn't have to be for > free or on a network server; just that accessing the software must > give access to the source. This should cope with any accusations of > this clause implying an additional cost. But this alternate wording would make the clause even more restrictive, as it would extend the requirement to cases where the modified version of the Program does *not* support remote interaction "through a computer network" (whatever that may mean...). Or did I misunderstand your intended meaning? -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp3UGhb2ohh3.pgp
Description: PGP signature