Le mercredi 13 juin 2007 à 01:27 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit : > > > :::: Bad: use restriction, with a cost associated to it > > > > A better wording would then be: > > ... an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source under > > the same conditions as those of using the Program. > > I'm sorry, but I really cannot understand what you mean. > Could you elaborate, please? The current wording is way too specific, and requires providing the source at no charge on a network server. In the event where the user pays for using the service, the source code availability would then have to be included in the price. This would also fix the remote X11 display case that was imagined earlier, as it makes clear that accessing the software must give access to the source. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=