On Sunday 03 June 2007 14:46:12 Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <[🔎] 20070603194630.GE23796@grep.be>, Wouter Verhelst
<wouter@debian.org> writes
>That's wishful thinking, at best. Common knowledge defines "fee" as
>"something involving the transfer of money". If it isn't, then the GPL
>is also non-free, by the very same rationale: the fact that you are
>required to produce source when so asked if you do distribute binaries
>from source under the GPL means that you are giving up a right ("the
>right not to distribute any source") which you might otherwise have,
>which could be considered to be a fee.
And what about societies without money? "fee" does NOT equal "money".
Your "common knowledge" is not my understanding ...
Okay, now I'm really curious. Exactly which "societies without money" are
you talking about?