Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, NeuRoTiX wrote: > >>I took a look to the Creative Commons but it seems to be a non >>GPL-compatible license. > > > Yes, most of the CC licenses (there are a few dozen of the things) are > not GPL compatible. > > I got a question. Why CC music/graphics cannot be used in GPL programs? GPL allows system("xxx") (or fork+exec) to run non-GPL programs because it's a separated work. Why fopen("xxx.png") is not a separated work? -- PaulLiu(Ying-Chun Liu) E-mail address:PaulLiu.bbs@bbs.cis.nctu.edu.tw
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature