On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:01:40AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Do you think it would be worth doing the licence change process for the > website and the Release Notes at the same time? I would guess there's > probably quite a bit of overlap for authors and translators between the > two. IMHO, all the technical documentation (including the Release Notes) should be just licensed by the GPL (preferably, although some authors might prefer a BSD license for them). The GPL license is used by: the FAQ, the Securing Debian Manual, the "Introduction to i18n", the Administrator's Guide, the User's Guide (including Progeny's), the "Euro HOWTO", Developer's Reference, the Project History, the Debian Reference, the Apt HOWTO, and the New Maintainer's Guide (maybe some other minor documents in the DDP CVS area too). The Release Notes is probably one of the few (big) documents in the DDP CVS that does not actually use the GPL license. Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature