Re: GFDL v2 draft 1 analysis [long]
Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:22:22 +0000 (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
> > Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote:
> > > "Allows non-free derivs" ?
> >
> > That's probably accurate too, yes.
>
> OK, I'm going to use that tagline for my comments (as soon as I submit
> them to the FSF).
Belatedly, I remember the problem with that: FSF has some different but
undefined interpretation of 'free' for documentation, which is why they
call it the Free Documentation License with a straight face.
Allows modified versions to be more restricted?
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: