On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:38:35 +0000 (GMT) MJ Ray wrote: > Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote: [...] [...] > > So, how come the LGPL is considered a copyleft license? > > Or even the GFDLv2draft1, for that matter: it includes one or > > two relicensing clause(s)... > > This is a very good question and I have no answer. Hence, you should see why I'm puzzled... [...] > > BTW, going back to the original issue: can you suggest a better > > category name than "Kills copyleft"? > > "Does not ensure freedom of modified versions." Anything shorter? "Allows non-free derivs" ? -- But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgplcZsH4lTnr.pgp
Description: PGP signature