Re: firefox -> iceweasel package is probably not legal
Sean Kellogg <skellogg@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> So, you propose that Firefox refers to both the code base and the browser?
Not only that, but firefox (lowercase, not as in the trademark) is also
a debian control field term and an executable invocation. None of those
are used to label packages in the trade sense (rather than the dpkg sense)
and both seem like functional labels, as well as being used by sysadmins
sometimes.
Hope that explains,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: