Francesco Poli wrote: > Or otherwise, povray upstream authors could be persuaded to relicense in > a DFSG-free manner, so that we would *gain* one new interesting package > for main, rather than *losing* one (that was wrongly placed in main). > ;-) povray upstream actually *wants* to change the license to be open; they simply have the standard problem of being unable to get permission from all contributors. Thus, the only way to relicense is to rewrite. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature