Upstream changed the license :) Am Samstag, den 07.01.2006, 15:59 -0800 schrieb Don Armstrong: > On Sat, 07 Jan 2006, Daniel J. Priem wrote: > > Can i just package the follwing and release it under the GPL? > > Not yet; see below for details. > > > The software is free, you can assume a GNU licence. It is provided > > entirely as is and no liability is accepted at all. Any bug reports, > > ideas, etc, email support, but no promises. > > That unfortunatly isn't too terribly convincing as to which GNU > license they wanted their work to be released under; they should use > the text in the GPL itself if that's the license that the code should > be released under. > > > i ve been tried to reach them but didnt get a response > > This is more damning than the mere copyright/licensing issues; if you > can't get talk to upstream, and aren't willing to take the reigns for > upstream development yourself if the package enters Debian, you > generally shouldn't even consider packaging it for an official Debian > release. > > > Don Armstrong >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil