[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions

Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:

> That said, if not d-legal, then at least d-project.

Indeed - I think discussion what what the DFSG /should/ mean (such as
whether source code is required for certain items) is a project wide
decision rather than a legal one.

(The thread in question is on -project, so I think it seems reasonable
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org

Reply to: