Re: FYI, kernel firmware non-freeness discussions
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:35:52PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I have no idea why -legal isn't in the loop, but I figured if I gave y'all a
> > heads up, you would be soon enough.
> Because it's -legal's job to interpret licenses, not the DFSG?
The two are intertwined: d-legal interprets licenses to figure out if they
meet the DFSG, which intrinsically requires interpreting the DFSG, too.
That said, if not d-legal, then at least d-project.