On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:53:23AM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 1/8/06, Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com> wrote: > > Unrestricted downloads of the GPL'd stuff aside for a moment, the GPL > > gives me a copy or two. Thank you. The distribution of those copies (as > > I see fit) is made under 17 USC 109, not the GPL. Being not a contract > > (according to the FSF), the GPL is irrelevant at the time of distribution. > However, the law only gives you the right to sell and *dispose* the > work, e.g. selling a book. The law was not originally designed with > software in mind. So if you do not accept the GPL, then you can give a > copy of the program to me, but you will have to delete all of your own > copies. > This discussion is quite irrelevant Yes. Can y'all stop feeding the troll (kook) now, please? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature