Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement
On 1/7/06, Andrew Suffield <email@example.com> wrote:
> We've already talked to CC and they agreed to fix their licenses; 3.0
> and later should be fine, when they're released (2.x never will be).
Well - it's a goal for CC & FSF to permit content to move freely
between CC-BY-SA and GFDL (or possibly "simplified" GFDL). I'm happy
to help with that as an academic "customer" of these licenses that
would like to ensure the final result is usable by Debian. I see the
relevant people at CC & FSF fairly regularly.
just let me know if I can help...
http://freelogy.org/wiki/User:AlexanderWait (GnuPG ID 4153C516)