Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement

[Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>]

Ian Jackson wrote:

> Also,
>> (4) How can this be fixed?
> 
> This section should be clarified and strengthened.  In particular, we
> should encourage documentation authors to (at the moment) dual-licence
> GDFL/GPL.

The recommendation is: "License your documentation under the same license
as the program it goes with.  If you need to license under the GFDL for some
reason, dual-licence."

I think -legal came to a very definite consensus that licensing the
documentation under the exact same license as the program was always the
right thing to do.  It saves *so* much trouble.

-- 
ksig --random|