Re: GR Proposal: GFDL statement
Ian Jackson wrote:
>> (4) How can this be fixed?
> This section should be clarified and strengthened. In particular, we
> should encourage documentation authors to (at the moment) dual-licence
The recommendation is: "License your documentation under the same license
as the program it goes with. If you need to license under the GFDL for some
I think -legal came to a very definite consensus that licensing the
documentation under the exact same license as the program was always the
right thing to do. It saves *so* much trouble.