On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:21:07AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > At any rate, I do agree that your interpretation is the *correct* one for > the goals of the GPL. It may be a nice interpretation for the *goals* of the GPL, but it's definitely not what the GPL actually says. See my mail a few back in this thread, around "Note that the list ...". (Not that it hurts to avoid it anyway, though I don't think there's actually any ambiguity.) -- Glenn Maynard