Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
* Andreas Barth:
>> > I'm arguing with your interpretation of "program" to mean anything you
>> > want - in this case potentially any random string of bytes.
>
>> Why do you think this would change anything? Isn't this the
>> assumption under which debian-legal operates in general?
>
> Actually, it is not the assumption under which the DFSG operates in
> general.
Quite deliberately, I wrote "debian-legal", not "DFSG". 8-)
I don't know much about DFSG interpretation by the people who actually
decide what's DFSG-compliant and what's not. Maybe their view is
suffficently distinct, but the archive doesn't show it, IMHO.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>