On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:14:34AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:51:43AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:25:19PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > > Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de> wrote: > > > > I surely hope we're not at the point where constructive dialog has > > > > become impossible. I ask all of you to judge my words on their merit > > > > and not past statements made by other people. > > > > > > I think we're not, but I don't know whether either mplayer > > > developers or debian developers can convince a ftpmaster > > > (which is where this tab stops) about this issue, or we > > > have to wait for a legal brain to comment. > > > > Specifically, it doesn't help that mplayer developers have pretty much > > run their credibility into the ground by now. > > > > After countless rounds of "It's free now!" "Here's six more blatant > > abuses, three of which you already knew about [references]" "Fuck > > off", I'm not overly surprised that people are disinclined to believe > > them. > > Ever since I restarted this discussion in March 2004[1] all the issues > raised by people on this list have been addressed by me. If some are > still outstanding, please point them out. Personally, I can't really say that I care about mplayer, I can just see why people would be disinclined to deal with it after all that nonsense. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature