Re: (DRAFT) FAQ on documentation licensing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
>> Of course, a copy of the GNU Emacs manual printed on dead trees is
>> unequivocally documentation,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> You mean 'not software'. It's always documentation; in softcopy form
> it happens to be software as well (and since it's written in info, it
> probably qualifies as a program).
I'd make that a "definitely", since you can run it directly through
TeX, and all of the "@" commands are in fact TeX macros (from
texinfo.tex).
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCXUxRVcFcaSW/uEgRAqbeAKCGU6T9GCphvMElofQPRwP5KyX/pACgp82Y
p+UJLjWEOY+GqnGIgZIhlsk=
=Dib/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: