[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: (DRAFT) FAQ on documentation licensing



On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
>     Of course, a copy of the GNU Emacs manual printed on dead trees is
> unequivocally documentation,
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You mean 'not software'. It's always documentation; in softcopy form
it happens to be software as well (and since it's written in info, it
probably qualifies as a program).

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: