Re: Clarification regarding PHP License and DFSG status
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >As a reminder, I see this clause as non-free because it starts as a
> >name-change clause, but then goes beyond and forbids an entire class of
> >names for derived works (any name having "PHP" as a substring, minus
> >some exceptions).
> >This is overreaching, IMO, and makes the clause non-free, even when
> >applied to PHP itself.
> Exactly, which part of the DFSG you think would forbid this?
The fact that it's a restriction on derived works (§3) that is not
explicitly allowed by §4?
§3 [...] The license must allow modifications and derived works,
§4 [...] The license may require derived works to carry a different
name or version number from the original software. [...]
Where I sleep at night, is this important compared to what I read
during the day? What do you think defines me? Where I slept or what I
did all day?
-- Thomas Van Orden of Van Orden v. Perry