[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Clarification regarding PHP License and DFSG status

* Matthew Palmer:

> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:08:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * MJ Ray:
>> > Do you think that this licence does not require a developer
>> > of a modified package (other than PHP) to lie by saying
>> > "This product includes PHP software"?
>> Perhaps the PHP folks subscribe to the view that PHP scripts are
>> derivative works of PHP.
> Ye ghods, I'd hope not.  That would be similar to believing that this
> message is a derivative of the English Grammar manual I read in school.

Or that all non-trivial Emacs Lisp code must be licensed under the
GPL.  This position is not *that* unusual...

Reply to: