Re: Clarification regarding PHP License and DFSG status
Florian Weimer <email@example.com> writes:
> * MJ Ray:
>> Do you think that this licence does not require a developer
>> of a modified package (other than PHP) to lie by saying
>> "This product includes PHP software"?
> Perhaps the PHP folks subscribe to the view that PHP scripts are
> derivative works of PHP. Then it wouldn't be lying, would it?
They still don't *include* PHP. There's a huge difference between
require and include.