Re: dual licensing (was: Re: [no subject])
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:28:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I mean the *developer* must comply with both licenses, eg if you d/l
> > under the GPL and MIT, then the developer must still put the written
> > offer for source code and meet all the distribution requirements of
> > the GPL, but anyone else can choose between the GPL and the MIT
> > license.
> In opened software, "We are all developers".
I think he meant to say "the copyright holder". In free software, we are
not all the copyright holder.