Re: dual licensing (was: Re: [no subject])
Yes. I meant the copyright holder.
On 11/6/05, Glenn Maynard <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:28:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > I mean the *developer* must comply with both licenses, eg if you d/l
> > > under the GPL and MIT, then the developer must still put the written
> > > offer for source code and meet all the distribution requirements of
> > > the GPL, but anyone else can choose between the GPL and the MIT
> > > license.
> > In opened software, "We are all developers".
> I think he meant to say "the copyright holder". In free software, we are
> not all the copyright holder.
> Glenn Maynard
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
This space for rent. Enquire within. Terms and conditions apply. See
store for details.
Get free domains - http://www.ezyrewards.com/?id=23484