Re: Is this license DFSG free?
Sean Kellogg <email@example.com> schrieb/wrote:
> The setence is ambigous if broken down sufficiently. However, if the
> Anthony's language is sufficient, it strikes me that the GPL is way
> too verbose. All you would need the GPL to say to require such a
> limited changelog would be "provide a notice of the date of any
> change" without reference to "you."
On the other hand, the GPL does not define how exactly one has to
describe one's identity. Is a not-widely-known alias enough? Is the full
name enough? Do you have to provide a street, phone or email address?