[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?



<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
On 10301 March 1977, MJ Ray wrote:

> Well, this is the first ftpmaster post to legal I've seen for
> months and it's a troll :-/  Pot and kettle one, too.

Im not a master, just a slave.

> Joerg, if you want to make your life easier, try opening bugs
> about any NEW licence questions and cc -legal,

Bugs? Where? Package: general? Or does -legal now have an on bts entry?
Stuff in NEW usually doesnt have a place for bugs (if it has it usually
has no license problems as it is already in, just a split).

> asking for someone to summarise with references. If that doesn't work
> for you, you could cc a particular contributor, or we could keep a
> list of volunteer contact people to help with licensing bugs if you
> don't want to use a mailing list.

Oh, I dont have a problem with writing to lists.

My *personal* experience with this list is just not so that I see a big
value posting to it. (Im mostly a reader on -legal)

-- 
bye Joerg
SUSE = Soll Unix Sein, Eigentlich.

Attachment: pgpts2dlvjqXA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: