Re: License question about regexplorer
Don Armstrong <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Could we at least wait until post-Helsinki? There's a session on the
>> DFSG planned, and it would be helpful to gain a better idea of what
>> the not-on-legal part of the project think about these sort of
> Have you had a chance to outline this panel discussion in slightly
> more detail yet?
Nope - I'm a bit busy preparing for Guadec at the moment, I'm afraid.
> [also, do you know why it doesn't appear here:
> http://comas.linux-aktivaattori.org/debconf5/general/proposals ?]
Absolutely none at all.
Matthew Garrett | firstname.lastname@example.org