Re: RES: What makes software copyrightable anyway?
On 5/19/05, Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> And once again, you're the only one who thinks we're doing this. The rest of
> us, as far as I can tell, think that giving a user a script that makes it
> easier to compile a certain binary does not equate to distribution of the
> same binary.
The only one posting that, sure.
> If it was, then the upstream would be as guilty as we are, since he
> presumably includes a configre script with --with-ssl as one of its options.
You are correct: we would not be the only guilty ones.
To my knowledge, we do a pretty good job of dealing with these issues.