On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:00:06 +0000 Andrew Suffield wrote: > People who are not operating under their real identity *cannot* be > trusted because there can be no penalty for breach of trust, it's that > simple. Well, trust and respect can grow for a fake identity (nick or nym), if this fake identity is used consistently in time. Perhaps you don't easily know what's the real identity behind that nick; or, in the other case, you *cannot* find out the real identity behind that nym. But you may know that the majority of his/her messages are pertinent and/or useful and/or smart and/or ... > So while you can participate in this manner, you'll always be > an outsider. Anything that you say or do will not be taken at face > value, it will be scrutinised and double-checked. I thought that reasonable care was spent to scrutinise anything being said by anyone, here. > > The impact this has on free software development should be obvious. Well, if you mean that anonymous and pseudonymous contributions are more difficult to handle copyright-wise, it's true. But, for instance, would you treat a (reproducible) bug report by an anonymous sender as less valuable? -- Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday. ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpFBpgsmxRlE.pgp
Description: PGP signature